Campus eBookstore Logo

Skip Navigation LinksEBook Details

Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis

Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis
Author: Forster Ndubisi
Price: $55.00
ISBN-10: 080187775X
ISBN-13: 9780801877759
Edition: -1
Get It!:
Delivery: BibliU Reader
Duration: Lifetime

Note:
Copy Selections To Clipboard: User can copy content to the clipboard with the following restriction: Initially allowance of 30 copy selections. Another copy selection allowed every Day. To a maximum of 30 total copy selections.
Printing Pages: User can print pages with the following restriction: Initially allowance of 30 pages. Another page allowed every Day. To a maximum of 30 total pages.

Description

Chosen by Choice Magazine as an Outstanding Academic Title for 2003

Ecological planning is the process of understanding, evaluating, and providing options for the use of landscape to ensure a better fit with human habitation. In this ambitious analysis, Forster Ndubisi provides a succinct historical and comparative account of the various approaches to this process. He then reveals how each of these approaches offers different and uniquely useful perspectives for understanding the dialogue between human and environmental processes.

Ndubisi begins by examining the philosophies behind and major contributors to ecological thinking during the past 150 years, as well as the paradigm shift in planning that occurred in recent decades as a result of a growing global ecological awareness. He then turns to landscape suitability analysis and discusses alternative approaches to ecological planning, such as applied human ecology, applied landscape ecology, and others. Finally, he offers a comparative synthesis of the approaches in order to reveal the theoretical and methodological assumptions inherent when planners choose one approach over the other. Ndubisi concludes that no one approach can by itself adequately address the whole spectrum of ecological planning issues. For this reason he offers guidance as to when it may be appropriate for landscape architects and planners to emphasize one approach rather than another.